Make sure your agents say the right thing to the right buyer.Make sure your agents saythe right thing to the right buyer.

Live demo of the Amdahl APIs: each question runs against a connected GTM corpus and returns evidence cited from real calls and CRM records.

Where did security reviews stall deals last quarter?. Result: 23 matches · 3 stall patterns. Deals citing: SOC 2 timing / bridge letter 14, Legal redlines on DPA 6, Pen-test evidence ask 3, SSO scoping 2. 14 deals cite SOC 2 timing — not price. The stall is paperwork, not conviction. Avg 24 days lost in the security loop; front-load the packet at Eval entry.

Which open deals have a champion who went quiet in the last 30 days?. Result: 9 deals · $1.4M at risk. Days silent: Vantiv · expansion 41, Corex · new logo 36, Helio · renewal+ 33, Braxton · new logo 31, Nimbus · expansion 30. 3 of 9 mentioned a reorg on their last call — champion risk, not deal risk. Re-engage Vantiv first: $320K and the EB was never multi-threaded.

What made buyers switch to us from Gong this year?. Result: 31 wins · 4 switch triggers. Wins citing: CRM + calls in one query 13, Cited, checkable answers 8, Agents can query it 6, Seat-price fatigue 4. Price is the 4th reason, not the 1st — lead battlecards with unified query, not cost. “Cited answers” shows up in 26% of switch stories; make it the demo's first beat.

Who offered discounts before the buyer even asked?. Result: 17 deals · $340K left on the table. Est. leakage ($K): T. Nguyen 126, L. Marsh 88, D. Okafor 67, K. Silva 41, P. Reyes 18. 16 of 17 concessions came inside 5 minutes of a budget mention — a reflex, not a strategy. Coach the pause: deals with no unprompted discount closed at the same rate.

Which renewals are quietly at risk — and what did the customer actually say?. Result: 6 flagged · 2 critical. Risk severity: Ferrous 91, Lumina 84, Paloma 62, Kestrel 58, Orchid 54. Ferrous said “consolidating vendors” in the QBR — nobody logged it in CRM. 2 critical accounts share one pattern: sponsor change + usage dip. Escalate both this week.

Evaluate this cold opener against outbound that got replies on won ENT deals. Result: 3.5 / 5 · Partial · 2 gaps. Won-deal match: Specificity 82, Proof before ask 71, One clear CTA 79, Outcome / ROI hook 61. Fail — No measurable outcome. Won replies tie to a business result in 6 of 10; this stops at “cited answers.” Fix — Name one proof point from a similar ENT win before the calendar ask.

Evaluate this discovery script vs talk patterns on calls we won vs lost. Result: 3.8 / 5 · Pass · 2 cuts. Won − lost (pp): ROI quantification 38, Champion coaching 31, Timeline urgency 24, Feature dump -27, Early pricing defense -19. Pass — Pipeline + stall questions match won calls; keep that spine. Cut — Feature tour and early pricing mirror loss patterns — classic slip signal.

Score this hero copy against the words buyers use on won first calls. Result: 2.6 / 5 · Fail · vocabulary mismatch. Buyer-language match: “revenue intelligence” 2, “AI-native” 6, “pipeline you can trust” 31, “every conversation” 44, “Stop guessing” 27. Fail — “revenue intelligence” appears in 2% of buyer speech; it's vendor vocabulary. Steal from calls — “answers I can check” is how won-deal buyers describe the value. Use their words.

Fact-check this battlecard line against our calls and what the market says. Result: 3.2 / 5 · Partial · 2 rewrites. Gap: Only unified CRM + calls 12, Cited answers 8, vs Gong faster 64, vs Salesforce cheaper 71, Support diff 22. Rewrite — “Only platform” overclaims; buyers rarely say it. Soften + cite 3 calls. Ignore market noise — “Salesforce is cheaper” trends online; your won deals barely mention it.

Evaluate this revival email against the reason each account actually went dark. Result: 2.5 / 5 · Fail · ignores loss reasons. Why these accounts went dark: Lost on a feature gap 61, Lost on timing 18, Lost on budget 12, Champion left 9. Fail — 61% of these accounts left over a feature gap that has since shipped. The email never says so. Split the send — 3 loss cohorts need 3 different “what changed” lines. One blast fits none.